Re: [Full-Disclosure] (Psexec on *NIX)

["James Matthews" <nytrokiss () gmail com>]

But naturally it happens all the time! That's what i love about computer
security when ever you try to tell someone to do something normal and smart
they do the polar opposite =)

On 2/4/07, Q-Ball <qballus () gmail com> wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:40:47 +0530, Raj Mathur said:
> > > I believe we have had this discussion before, but I'll iterate my
> > > beliefs in favour of allowing direct root access again:
> >
> > > - Key-based root logins are quite secure.  I don't see any reason why
> > > key-based root login would be any less secure than permitting a user
> > > login followed by an sudo.
> >
> > It's not the security of the login itself - it's the ability to create
> > an audit trail of which userid performed an action.  If you can find
> > some other way to...
> >
>
> Yes ability to audit is important, and you can still retain
> accountably with direct root logons depending upon configuration but
> there are two major security problems
> with direct root logons:
> - Remote brute forcing. Personally I'd rather someone crack 2 accounts
> rather than just one, but maybe that's just me ;-)
> - Security should be implemented on a least privilege basis. Logging
> on as root as opposed to a user, isn't always required and just
> increases your window of opportunity eg. SSH channel attacks, key
> loggers, brute forcing, etc.Quite often sudo should suffice for
> regular tasks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



--
http://www.goldwatches.com
http://www.wazoozle.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/