Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Captive Portal bypassing
From: coderman <coderman () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:07:23 -0800
On Dec 10, 2007 2:04 PM, gmaggro <gmaggro () rogers com> wrote:
... Not everyone has access to something listening on 53 that is ready to be tunneled to. Nor is everyone clever enough to go about doing that sort of thing.
if they've got a whitelist for UDP 53 you can openvpn out nicely. i get hit or miss success with this; most national hotspot services use a DNS proxy for UDP 53 traffic, so you can try OzyManDNS and bask in the gratuitous inefficiency of your side channel transport... :) sadly, ICMP tunnel is rarely useful these days either.
Bah. Who cares about that. Our governments have proven they do not respect the rule of law; why should we?
"Pirates and Emperors" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQBWGo7pef8 apparently the answer is, "because they're bigger" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing T Biehn (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing Steven Adair (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing Peter Besenbruch (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing coderman (Dec 10)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 11)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing coderman (Dec 11)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing coderman (Dec 11)
- Re: Captive Portal bypassing gmaggro (Dec 10)