Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
From: Troy Cregger <tcregger () kennedyinfo com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:36:49 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Everyone is... but this guy Jesse seems to actually be a fraud. Most of the sites that originally carried the story have pulled it and some http://www.socialistalternative.org/news/article13.php?id=261 have issued statements denouncing the use of fraud and misinformation as a means to build opposition to the war. Don't believe everything you see on the Internet. c0ntex wrote:
You are entitled to your opinion. On 11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl () gmail com> wrote:A link to your own blog is not support for your argument. That's called circular reasoning. In addition, if you had bothered to do a little research, you would have noticed *huge* discrepancies. Try here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth The unit he claimed he was in, was not deployed where he said it was. His flash (patches, unit designations) on his uniform are either put on incorrectly, not used by the division he claims to be in, and/or no longer used by the military. His uniform is wildly... well, inconsistent is the best word here. Some of the awards and citations he claims to have received would be impossible to earn in the time he was active. Really, I am constantly amazed by the lack of critical thinking people exhibit these days. It doesn't take long to find actual citations to back up a position. A loon talking in a video is *not* a credible source. Unfortunately, people want to believe something that backs their own opinions so much that they will take unsubstantiated stories as truth and use that as evidence. Of course when someone points out that "evidence" is fraud and fake... Well, at best the person gets ignored, at worst a tool of the vast neo-con conspiracy. (Seriously, given the governments track record at keeping things secret... a "vast" conspiracy is ridiculous at best) Hoax and fraud does nothing but weaken one's position regardless of that position's overall merits. On 9/11/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb () gmail com> wrote:http://noderat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6ADE4614B66EADD2!1321.entry On 11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl () gmail com> wrote:Uh. You do realize this was a hoax, right? On 9/9/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb () gmail com> wrote:http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5587990522549547050 -- regards c0ntex _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-- regards c0ntex
- -- Troy Cregger Lead Developer, Technical Products. Kennedy Information, Inc One Phoenix Mill Ln, Fl 3 Peterborough, NH 03458 (603)924-0900 ext 662 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFBcjhnBEWLrrYRl8RAvLyAJ4kLqums/oZhhoIumUuIj9CiA8BfACfR55V go2Rd7fz7JCP+j5Z3J8rTFA= =OpAh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 09)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Philosophil (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Troy Cregger (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this pauls (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this c0ntex (Sep 11)
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Anders B Jansson (Sep 11)
- Message not available
- Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this Troy Cregger (Sep 11)