Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Responsibility
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:41:46 -0400
On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:27:07 EDT, Scott Forrest said:
I would think it would be a matter of negligence if the previous IT Consultant setup wireless access for Hotel Customers to use that also had direct access to the Hotel's network in some way that a virus could jump to their business servers. That just doesn't sound like "sound" or "secure" planning.
All too many networks are set up by a McSE (You want fries with that?) who wouldn't know a secure network if it bit them on the ass. And having been bitten, they'd remove all the secure network's teeth to prevent further bites.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Responsibility Greg (May 21)
- Re: Responsibility Line Noise (May 21)
- Re: Responsibility Paul Schmehl (May 21)
- Re: Responsibility Sol Invictus (May 22)
- Re: Responsibility <...> (May 23)
- Re: Responsibility Sean Comeau (May 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Responsibility Scott Forrest (May 25)
- Re: Responsibility Michael Holstein (May 25)
- RE: Responsibility Scott Forrest (May 25)
- Re: Responsibility Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Responsibility gboyce (May 25)
- Re: Responsibility Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)