Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Internet Explorer 0day
From: rembrandt () jpberlin de
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:41:54 +0100 (CET)
HUH? You mean like when they added basic HTTP CONNECT back in October of 2004? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/nc/socks.c.diff?r1=1.8&r2=1.9&f=h http://www.openbsd.org/plus37.html "Add support for the HTTP proxy CONNECT method to nc(1)." Has had SOCKS4/5 for quite a while before that.
Just to point it out clearly: http://www.openbsd.org/39.htm nc(1) now supports HTTP Proxy authentication, making it very useful as a ssh ProxyCommand. Kind regards, Rembrandt _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day Andrew A (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day xyberpix (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day Expanders (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day GroundZero Security (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day bigdaddyzeroday (Mar 14)
- RE: Internet Explorer 0day Soderland, Craig (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day KF (lists) (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day Don Bailey (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day Joachim Schipper (Mar 14)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day nocfed (Mar 15)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day rembrandt (Mar 15)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day crazy frog crazy frog (Mar 15)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day Joachim Schipper (Mar 15)
- Re: Internet Explorer 0day KF (lists) (Mar 14)