RE: Industry calls on Microsoft to scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws

["William Lefkovics" <william () lefkovics net>]

> > hence the ideals of being an anonymous group.
 
Yes, how convenient for you (which was really my point).
 
What is a 'rogue' employee?  
One that is not trustworthy and doesn't have the gonads to leave their
comfortable pay cheque?

Anyway, best of luck to you, but the initiative your pseudo-consortium put
forth in this thread is misguided, poorly presented, and makes others 'laugh
with glee'.


________________________________

From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:46 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to
scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws


Wow, hence the ideals of being an anonymous group. Like if names were put to
list, they wouldn't be sacked straight away... Wake up, smell the postitives
of being anonymous for five minutes, or maybe that leaves you, CERT, SANS a
bit head rubbed, just like SANS once said FIREFOX posed a lesser threat that
IE. OH, the guys I speak to at MS were chuckling about that one. Of course
SANS reversed their claim that FIREFOX was less vulnerable than IE later,
much later. The credibility of SANS, of course comes into questions, while
folks at n3td3v c onsortium laugh with glee, as the big players get it so
badly wrong infront of the international stage.


On 3/26/06, William Lefkovics <william () lefkovics net> wrote: 

        Not to mention the absence of legitimate names of the folks.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
        [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Mike
Hoye
        Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:08 PM 
        To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
        Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap
        PatchTuesday for Critical flaws
        
        On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:39:32AM +0100, n3td3v wrote: 
        > One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually
people
        > from MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already.
        
        You know, legitimate groups don't have to keep claiming, over and
over, that
        they're legit. 
        
        It's remarkable how that works.
        
        --
        "Totally mad. Utter nonsense. But we'll do it because it's brilliant
        nonsense." - Douglas Adams
        
        _______________
        
        _______________________________________________ 
        Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
        Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
        Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
        



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/