Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Noise on the list
From: n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:12:56 +0000
The only people driving off quality discussion and people are the folks complaining that posters don't meet their standard of intellect and disclosure policy and presentation of vulnerabilities. But keep calling netdev an idiot, you'll go far in your career. On 3/21/06, Jason <security () brvenik com> wrote:
Frederic, Your reaction is the intent of the spam and porn and trolling. It is in an attempt to drive off quality discussion and people. If you cannot keep up with it we all understand. I personally consider this list great training for handling the idiots that exist in every day life. There is a netdev in every crowd. Frederic Pasteleurs wrote:Hello everybody, I subscribed to this mailing list in 2004 just to keep me informed about some useful tips and the latest issues/problems in the software packages i'm using for my everyday computing habits. I had a hard time to keep up with the flow of mails in the beginning, but it was still manageable. The n3td3v trolling case several months ago was annoying, but stillokay.Then came the fake advisories spamming, i was a bit pissed by the ammount of mails to delete, but didn't care much more than that. Then the animal porn drawings spamming: this time, i was seriously considering leaving the list and i felt sorry for the huge waste of valuable bandwidth and disk space. Now, i'm afraid to read any mail with the [Full-disclosure] header, because nowadays you have to dig through childish and mine-is-bigger-than-yours messages to actually find some interesting and valuable information. I know that's the price to pay for an unmoderated list, but the noise level reached a level i could not tolerate and i will leave this list by the end of the week. It seems that unmoderated list works only for mature people and those that keep silent when they have nothing to say... Come on people, how old are you ?? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Noise on the list Frederic Pasteleurs (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list FistFucker (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list Anders B Jansson (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list Jason (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list n3td3v (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list Jason (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list n3td3v (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list n3td3v v3dt3n (Mar 21)
- Re: Noise on the list n3td3v (Mar 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: Noise on the list Edward Pearson (Mar 21)
- Re: FW: Noise on the list KF (lists) (Mar 21)
- Re: FW: Noise on the list n3td3v (Mar 21)
- Re: FW: Noise on the list Michael Tewner (Mar 21)
- Re: FW: Noise on the list n3td3v (Mar 21)
- RE: FW: Noise on the list Grant Rietze (Mar 21)