Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006=%Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:29:48 -0500
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:14:35 GMT, Dave Korn said:
Ah, well, that wasn't exactly obvious from the Received header that you posted, now was it?! Heh, that was one vital piece of info without which nobody could be sure they understood exactly what it was that you were showing us. I thought it might have been a quote from one of the headers of one of the spams!
Actually, the fact that the Received: header showed that the toad.com machine accepted the mail, combined with the fact that it then forwarded the mail to the list (else we'd not have *seen* the Received: in question), combine to tell us one of 3 things: 1) Somebody telnet'ed to the *next* machine's port 25 and forged that Received: line (somewhat unlikely, as that box said 'received from toad.com'). Of course, you can only *really* trust headers added by boxes you control, but in this case things look fairly kosher up to where lists.grok.org.uk accepts the mail, and there's no obvious reason to disbelieve its Received: line. 2) The entity giving it to toad.com performed some variant of SMTP AUTH, convincing toad.com they were a legitimate user and allowed to relay outbound. 3) It's an open relay/proxy. Incidentally, the single Received: line I posted was actually for the German Tor box rather than toad.com. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access, (continued)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access A . L . M . Buxey (Mar 16)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Christian "Khark" Lauf (Mar 16)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access David Thiel (Mar 16)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Michael Holstein (Mar 17)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Bill Weiss (Mar 16)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Christian "Khark" Lauf (Mar 16)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access leToff (Mar 17)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006=% Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Dave Korn (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006=% Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access leToff (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006=%Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Dave Korn (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006=%Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 17)
- Re: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access A . L . M . Buxey (Mar 16)