Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine
From: "/dev/null" <exceed () email si>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:05:18 +0200
Dear Thierry Zoller, thank you very much. Was really driving me mad... Were there any errors in the code that you actually had to fix? On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 at 16:08:25, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
(Hint to /dev/null - if you can't get it to compile, and can't figure out why, you probably shouldn't ask for binaries on a list known to have black hats on it. Do you know what color Thierry's hat is? Or mine? :)
Mr. Vladis, thanks for the hint. Anyway, AFAIK binaries were posted/asked on the list many times. Yes, I'm not C++ expert, so I asked experts to help. That's the way it goes. Regarding hat colors, you're both gray :) Cheers, -E. ____________________ http://www.email.si/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- CodeCrypter mutation engine /dev/null (Jul 20)
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 20)
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine Thierry Zoller (Jul 20)
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 20)
- Re[2]: CodeCrypter mutation engine Thierry Zoller (Jul 20)
- Re: Re[2]: CodeCrypter mutation engine Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 20)
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine /dev/null (Jul 20)
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 20)
- RE: CodeCrypter mutation engine Edward Pearson (Jul 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine daylasoul (Jul 21)
- Re: CodeCrypter mutation engine Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 21)