Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Taking from 1 is copying. Taking from 2 is Plagiarism.
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:15:14 -0500
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:59:42 CST, "J.A. Terranson" said:
This is just one more nail in the coffing of the Certificate Money Machines. All you CISSP's just because worthless based upon your certifying authority.
Actually, it does nothing of the sort. There were study guides before, and this one doesn't change matters. Before this book came out, the cert was basically just saying "This person managed to keep enough security info inside his cranium to pass the exam". And after the book came out, the cert still means the same thing. The bigger question is: "Does knowing enough to pass the exam correspond to having actual security clue?" - but the existence of a new study guide doesn't change the debate on that question.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Taking from 1 is copying. Taking from 2 is Plagiarism. J.A. Terranson (Feb 23)
- Re: Taking from 1 is copying. Taking from 2 is Plagiarism. Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 23)