Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PDF's unsafe?
From: "Alex" <alexindef () rogers com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:32:12 -0400
Embedded executable attachments - could be any type. Adobe (Reader from version 6 & full version from version 5) allows to open and execute them manually. Adobe built-in JavaScript and auto events do not allow execute the attachments (at least from my tries, somebody could be more successful) Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geo." <geoincidents () nls net> To: <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] PDF's unsafe?
and I know it doesn't run javascript or allowexecutable attachments in PDF's, like Adobe's does.<< Executable attachments? How? Geo. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- PDF's unsafe? Geo. (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Andrew Haninger (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Brent Colflesh (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 21)
- RE: PDF's unsafe? ad (Sep 21)
- Message not available
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 21)
- RE: PDF's unsafe? Geo. (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Matthew Murphy (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Alex (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Andrew Haninger (Sep 21)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Micheal Espinola Jr (Sep 21)
- RE: PDF's unsafe? y0himba (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Gina H Montgomery (Sep 22)
- Re: PDF's unsafe? Xyberpix (Sep 23)