Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter)
From: James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 02:32:41 +0100
Surely this kind of message is a really bad idea. What is the possible true business value of such a filter? What is the potential impact upon security to disclose the information that this mail does? What is the cost of deployment of this system against the costs related to it's potential, and actual effects? As novell say "cool" solutions. What a wonderful business term. I think I might use the word "cool" in my next board meeting. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: gwava-admin () ird govt nz <gwava-admin () ird govt nz> Date: May 10, 2005 2:26 AM Subject: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter) To: undisclosed-recipients A message sent by you was blocked by GWAVA - Content protection for Novell GroupWise. The message was blocked for the following reason(s): Content filter The message contained the following information: Subject:Re: [Full-disclosure] PWCK Overflow POC Code Redhat/Suse older versions or something (maybe later too) From:"jftucker () gmail com".INTERNET.IRDOM Recipient(s): [No To Addresses] [No Cc Addresses] JBM1.clhpo.IRDOM_Addresses The following information details the events that prevented delivery of this message: EventDetails Content filtered Content within this message was disallowed. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter) James Tucker (May 09)
- Re: Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)
- Re: Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter) James Tucker (May 10)
- Re: Fwd: GWAVA Sender Notification (Content filter) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 09)