Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Reverse dns
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:57:57 -0600
Is there an RFC *requirement* for reverse dns?I've been looking through the RFCs and I can't find it. Some folks think reverse dns should be completely disabled. I know for sure that this will break email, because many mail servers won't talk to a server that doesn't reverse. Tcpdump also doesn't like hosts that won't reverse.
What I'm looking for is a standard (RFC) that states that enabling reverse lookups is *required* or reverse lookups are *optional*. If they're optional, then reverse could be disabled for most hosts.
I'm also looking for a list of things that *break* when you disable reverse (e.g. mail).
RULES FOR RESPONDING:1) "Reverse is a good thing" is not an answer. Neither is "Reverse is a bad thing". 2) Opinions are not useful - stick to facts only - chapter and verse please.
3) All replies to the list please - others will find this useful as well. Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Vincent Archer (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Duo (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Duo (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Danny (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) TheGesus (Mar 10)
- RE: Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Edward Ray (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Dave Korn (Mar 11)
- Re: Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Danny (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Vincent Archer (Mar 10)