Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Jack Szeszycki
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:41:09 -0400
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:00:29 -1000, Jason Coombs said:
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:00:40 +0930, Jack_Szeszycki () viscount com au said:I will respond to your email when I return.If, of course, the e-mail is still there when Jack returns. ;)Does this form a binding contract?
At least his didn't include a "this is privileged info and you may not distribute it further" clause that tries to form a binding contract. I wish it had, I'd love to chase after them to invoice them for the costs of taking down our mailserver to make sure the message is *really* gone. Oh, and we'd have to do up new backup tapes. LTO-2s are *expensive*, and when you're doing several million messages a day, you go through a lot of them. Especially fun on a Monday, when we may need to clean up 3 day's worth of tapes... ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Jack Szeszycki Jack_Szeszycki (Jun 29)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 29)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki Jason Coombs (Jun 29)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 29)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki `Zidane Tribal (Jun 30)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki Jason Coombs (Jun 29)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki Dave Korn (Jun 30)
- Re: Jack Szeszycki Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 29)