Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T-
From: James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:02:21 -0400
I agree wholeheartedly. On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:05:55 -0500, Mary Landesman <mlande () bellsouth net> wrote:
While I feel great compassion for the deceased Marine's father, I do not believe that grief should override security, privacy, terms of service, and good judgement. Any email Justin Ellsworth wished his father to have could reasonably be expected to have been sent to his father prior to Justin's death - by Justin, of course. Any email destined for other persons is not - nor should it ever be - the property of anyone other than Justin and the person to whom the email was sent. If Justin wanted his father to inherit his email account, he would/should have provided his dad with the logon info. Excerpted from Yahoo's ToS agreement: -------------------- 21. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES You agree that, except as otherwise expressly provided in this TOS, there shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement. -------------------- And under item 25 (General Information): -------------------- No Right of Survivorship and Non-Transferability. You agree that your Yahoo! account is non-transferable and any rights to your Yahoo! I.D. or contents within your account terminate upon your death. Upon receipt of a copy of a death certificate, your account may be terminated and all contents therein permanently deleted. -------------------- As a Yahoo member, I would expect these terms to be enforced. It is tragic that a father lost his son. It is understandable that the father wishes to gain access to every word his son ever typed. But, no matter how cold it may seem, just because it is understandable doesn't make it right. Now, if there were reason to believe that a crime had been committed and that evidence lies in the email, that's a different story. In such a case, I believe the email should be turned over to the authorities. But absent legal need, turning over email to a grieving parent/spouse/child is a dangerous and undesirable precedent. Yahoo should be applauded for protecting the privacy of its members. Frankly, I am shocked that many members of this particular list seem to feel otherwise. As it stands, Yahoo's security policy suits me to a -T-. -- Mary _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- Mary Landesman (Jan 05)
- Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- James Tucker (Jan 02)
- RE: [inbox] Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- Exibar (Jan 01)
- Re: [inbox] Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- n3td3v (Jan 01)
- RE: [inbox] Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- Exibar (Jan 01)
- Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 06)
- Re: This sums up Yahoo!s security policyto a -T- James Tucker (Jan 02)