Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: mailman email harvester
From: "Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:11:08 -0000
"James Longstreet" wrote in message news:Pine.A41.4.58.0502081019420.328944 () tigger cc uic edu...
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Dave Korn wrote:Why? You hoping to sell it to spammers? Obfuscating *works*; if YOU break it, that makes YOU a spamming motherfucker. Why don't you go fuck yourself instead?The name of the list is Full-Disclosure. This is like saying "gets() works, if you show that it's unsafe, that makes YOU an evil evil hacker."
He's already shown the POC "To raise awareness to this issue", and I have no complaint about that. But to continue and develop it into an actual usable production-level tool serves no further purpose in raising awareness and seems to me to be crossing the line into malware authoring; it's like the difference between writing a POC showing a bug in SQL server and writing MSBlast. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- mailman email harvester Bernhard Kuemel (Feb 07)
- Re: mailman email harvester Dave Korn (Feb 08)
- Re: Re: mailman email harvester James Longstreet (Feb 08)
- Re: Re: mailman email harvester Dave Korn (Feb 09)
- Re: mailman email harvester Bernhard Kuemel (Feb 09)
- Re: Re: mailman email harvester James Longstreet (Feb 08)
- Message not available
- Re: mailman email harvester Bernhard Kuemel (Feb 09)
- Re: mailman email harvester Dave Korn (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: mailman email harvester J b (Feb 08)