RE: Moderated lists

[FullDis.20.mandoskippy () spamgourmet com]

> > > > Yes, but with the ease of access to disposable e-mail accounts,
would that really work?  It might make it more difficult to be a troll,
but not much.  Or perhaps I don't grok what you mean.



Yes, it would make it only marginally more difficult, but instead of
getting 50 emails calling a troll immature (the actual feedback they are
looking to get) They get no feedback, just "Vote to remove netdev or
what ever"  based on a certain number, if it is reached, then the person
has to go create an account.  Eventually, without the flames to the
original troll, the person has to do work, i.e create another account
etc, and do it again, it is no longer convenient, and they are not
getting the reinforcement they  desire, so they just give up. Not only
that, they person also doesn't get the ability to have all the flames
attributed to one account.  Seem like a small thing?  Most of the trolls
have personality disorders where they seek attention, when they cannot
have the proper "credit" given to them for their trolls, it may lose
some of the luster. 






-----Original Message-----
From: John Omernik 
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:07 AM
To:
'+FullDis+mandoskippy+e016667720.full-disclosure#lists.grok.org.uk@spamg
ourmet.com'
Subject: Moderated lists

Why not do a self-regulating list?  Something along the lines of keeping
track of signup dates and IP addresses, then when a yahoo starts
spouting crap, put it to a vote on list. (only members older then xyz
date have a vote) If the list's wish is to have the user banned, then so
be it... 




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/