Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST


From: Rembrandt <rembrandt () jpberlin de>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:32:08 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:16:46 -0800
<uber () hush com> wrote:

I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  MAKING 
THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY 
RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY 
DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE 
GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS 
LIST.  MODERATING WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND 
WOULD BRING IT ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.

ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.

Moderation... moderation...
Well..

If you smoke a pipe and think about it you'll get 2 problems:

1. Moderation is a kind of cencorship
2. Who should moderate the list? 1 guy? 2? 3? 4?
   Do they realy know what IS importent for everybody?

I would angree that users who spam too much should get kicked of.
But as I said.. if you smoke a pipe you'll get some ideas:

You could delete e-Mails from such idiots. Or you could train "bmf". ;-)

Kind regards,
Rembrandt
- -- 
God did a bless on me,
So accapt the dark side in you.
Hate leads me to victory, so give me a war.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQFDoZqIHXWDTKj6tTkRAk6XAKCWyvXnKQGLyo9VrYk5Jlzgi4+dOQCgzJnL
Z8JKp0tI4vrcyeMR8UAzock=
=KSKI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: