Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack
From: ghost <ghosts () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:30:03 -0800
lol, n3td3v, you are so pathetic. Exactly 1 lame XSS post and now you're some sort of elite h4x0r, everyone who's googled knows how lame you really are. You must be related to morning_wood. Lets post this one last time.... -------------------------------------------------------- google: xploitable site:chat-help.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- http://www.bigblueball.com/forums/showthread.php?p=159874#post159874 02-17-2005, 12:11 PM n3td3v Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 220 Don't delete my posts again, without asking or giving warning. A quick e-mail to say your not happy with a post and ask me to modify or delete it myself is too much to ask?? Trust me, if you want to be rude, i'll be rude back to you, and if you keep doing it, i'll make sure this website gets hacked. I've had enough of it, its happened more than once, I don't like being treated the way you treat people. You'll probably want to delete this thread too, cause you love controlling people so much. Last edited by DJHyperbyte : 02-17-2005 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Removed insults. --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- http://lists.virus.org/full-disclosure-0411/msg00907.html FW: [Full-Disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment n3td3v n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +0000 On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a
site exposure (good and
bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of
it..it was the illegal
activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC
does some underground
stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I
wouldn't blame the
FD list for anything.
I wouldn't use the word blame? I think its a good thing if Full-Disclosure is helping to catch online criminals. I don't know if you like malicious hackers and other criminals, but yeah.... I dislike them. I would do anything in my power to stop online crime, from scriptkiddie stuff, to sex stuff,spam,scams, fraud, terrorism and back again. I have no space for anyone thinking they are elite and all the other hacker scene crap. Its time to clamp down on the BS thats on the net. If I was in gov, I would shut a site down that looks remotely hax0rish, even if they've done nothing wrong. All these crews and hacker groups, fk them all. The net needs zero tollerence with online crime. Govs should have the authority to close anything done because they feel like it, without needing to prove shit. I would even close IRC channels. Hackphreak on undernet looks harmless, but fk that. Close it anyway, its time to get a tighter grip on things. Thanks,n3td3v --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/dailydave/2004-q4/0221.html You know you're a moron if you have Dave Aitel laughing at you. --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- forums.chat-help.co.uk n3td3v Member Member Group: Banned Joined: 28-August 04 Active Stats Total Cumulative Posts 4 Re-occuring theme... --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- "carbonize" forums, banned again.. n3td3v post Oct 11 2004, 03:08 PM Post #3 QUOTE(carbonize @ Oct 10 2004, 03:29 AM) QUOTE(n3td3v @ Oct 9 2004, 08:18 PM) Suggestion: stop acting like a wanker on sites like chat-help and grow the fuk up. * Looked in a mirror lately? * Lamer you are a boring bastard with no skills. All you can post on homepage is about lame gmail accounts five years after the novelty of invites wore off. You cannot hack to save yourself homo. Running out of things to psot on homepage homo? Heh, i think so. This website will die a sorry death because you have nothing worth saying. --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- * this is him, before being banned and using the name n3td3v http://ourchat.org/forums/index.php?showuser=930 Viewing Profile: xploitable xploitable Everyone Needs A Cyber Security Pet In Life :) Group Icon Member Group: Banned Joined: 3-February 04 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- nobody special post Feb 3 2004, 04:20 PM Post #6 Unregistered ok, my email will be xploitable () reet us if anyone wants to crack the password then go ahead. *** after people saying that was stupid, then: I know, i was being silly earlier. I was bored. I'll even give my IP out to the public... 62.31.***.*** :D --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- HAHAHAHAHA http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:G41IIJ49DbAJ:www.chat-help.co.uk/forums/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D989+email+xploitable+site:chat-help.co.uk&hl=en&client=firefox-a xploitable Posted: Mar 13 2004, 07:07 PM Yahelite while running All platform of Microsoft Windows to crash. YAHELITE caused an invalid page fault in module RICHED20.DLL at 015f:4800e4ef. Registers: EAX=00524b3c CS=015f EIP=4800e4ef EFLGS=00010246 EBX=0052518c SS=0167 ESP=00734724 EBP=00734784 ECX=00000000 DS=0167 ESI=00525180 FS=34b7 EDX=00577e10 ES=0167 EDI=00000000 GS=0000 Bytes at CS:EIP: 8b 01 f6 40 68 40 75 0b 8b 41 04 85 c0 75 ef 83 Stack dump: 480102b7 00000000 00525180 00524b3c 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 Have Fun ;-) xploitable Posted: Mar 13 2004, 09:42 PM QUOTE (Chat-Help @ Mar 13 2004, 08:14 PM) "i think he talking about the bug that was fixed not long" I don't post old bugs, this is 0-day. xploitable Posted: Mar 13 2004, 09:57 PM QUOTE (_chat_help_ @ Mar 13 2004, 09:50 PM) "it in no way indicates either a bug in YahElite, or any form of 'boot' to crash YahElite." Being ignorant will get you no where. This is caused by 0-day exploit. --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- On 12/7/05, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
No one has seen any vulnerabilities by you. You have no justification to even being 100 miles near this list, let alone comment on other people and their postings. On 12/7/05, InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh () gmail com> wrote:Way to blow it out of perportion kiddie...._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes!, (continued)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! bkfsec (Dec 08)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! fok yo (Dec 08)
- RE: famouse n3td3v quotes! Scott Schappert (Dec 08)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! InfoSecBOFH (Dec 08)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! Michael Tewner (Dec 08)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! Paul (Dec 09)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! Kevin Ponds (Dec 08)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! Micheal Espinola Jr (Dec 08)
- Re: famouse n3td3v quotes! Jeff Rosowski (Dec 19)
- Re: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack Mike Hoye (Dec 07)
- Re: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack ghost (Dec 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack Tatercrispies (Dec 09)
- Re: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack sk / GroundZero (Dec 09)
- Re: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack n3td3v (Dec 09)
- RE: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack Paul (Dec 07)
- RE: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack Joseph Pierini (Dec 07)