Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files
From: Joachim Schipper <j.schipper () math uu nl>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:22:50 +0100
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:46:00PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:51:14 +0100, Joachim Schipper said:Though I wonder what the point is - it's not likely to be all that hard to run the code on another system. The main point seems to be to prevent administrators from making local changes, and I must admit to not seeing a problem with people who have bought the software doing that.You've never had to handle a support call that involved a customer that was clever enough to fuck around with the code, have you? That's a tech support nightmare waiting to happen, because it's guaranteed to be a major sinkhole of resources figuring out if the customer has hit an obscure bug in your code, or if they simply dorked it up.
That is a valid problem, but this is a rather heavy-handed solution. Just telling them that code that has been altered will require special consulting services instead of regular support. Joachim _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Ioncube Encoded PHP Files mz4ph0d (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files Joachim Schipper (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files mz4ph0d (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files Joachim Schipper (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files Joachim Schipper (Dec 22)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files mz4ph0d (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files Stefan Esser (Dec 21)
- Re: Ioncube Encoded PHP Files Joachim Schipper (Dec 21)