Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Re: MS not telling enough - ethics


From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:41:05 -0500 (CDT)


On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, DAN MORRILL wrote:

Anyone have any statistics they can share on how many people get their CISSP
revoked due to ethical issues?

I have first hand personal knowledge of 2 CISSPs who were brought to the
attention of ISC2 for (a) forging a college diploma, and (b) participating
in a blatant fraud against one of their clients, respectively.

And we all know of the great numbers of CISSPs who could not *possibly*
have met the minimum practice requirements (hrmmm... You're 17, and you
meet the prereqs?  Yeah, riiighttt.).

ISC2 cert is not policed, and therefore, it is worthless.  Worse than
worthless, as it purports to "certify" the character and nature of a
certificate holder, and does so while making zero attempt to actually
insure the implied endorsement is both valid and warranted.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin () mfn org
0xBD4A95BF


I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is
a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and
bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they
are intended to support.

don zweig, M.D.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: