Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: It's not that simple...
From: Micheal Espinola Jr <michealespinola () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:54:50 -0400
Surely. Disabling Null Sessions is recommended security practice. I have been doing it for at least 10 years now. I think I first wrote about it in "The Hardening of Windows NT", which IIRC, was in 1995. On 8/17/05, Kurt Seifried <listuser () seifried org> wrote:
Actually it really is that simple. Disabling Null sessions is entirely possible, quite easy, and doesn't break a lot (at least in my previous testing years ago it didn't break anything noticeable).
[snip]
-Kurt Seifried http://seifried.org/freescan2/ https://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/security
-- ME2 <http://www.santeriasys.net/> _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?], (continued)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Ron DuFresne (Aug 17)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] fd (Aug 18)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Nick FitzGerald (Aug 18)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Ron DuFresne (Aug 22)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] James Tucker (Aug 19)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Barrie Dempster (Aug 19)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Jason Coombs (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Kurt Seifried (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Micheal Espinola Jr (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Jason Coombs (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... yossarian (Aug 17)
- NULL sessions on Windows 2000 systems [Was: Re: Re: It's not that simple...] Jean-Baptiste Marchand (Aug 18)
- Re: NULL sessions on Windows 2000 systems [Was: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re:It's not that simple...] yossarian (Aug 18)