Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Motorist wins case after maths whizzes break speed camera code (fwd)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:28:17 -0400
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:07:19 CDT, "J.A. Terranson" said:
Mr Mirabilis yesterday said he had received more than 100 inquiries from motorists anxious to use the same defence. "People have shown it [the algorithm] has been hacked and it's open to viruses."
MD5 has viruses? (For what it's worth, the MD5 break concerned forming 2 different plaintexts that had the same MD5 hash, but you have no control over what the hash value actually is - forming a second plaintext to match a given plaintext's hash is still believed infeasible). Your best attack would probably be to attack the "chain of evidence" of the MD5 hash itself, and show that a different picture, with different MD5, could have replaced the original.. This proves 2 things: 1) The qualifications for "expert witness" are *way* too low. 2) We *really* need to be vigilant in our defense of correct usage of terms.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Motorist wins case after maths whizzes break speed camera code (fwd) J.A. Terranson (Aug 10)
- Re: Motorist wins case after maths whizzes break speed camera code (fwd) James Longstreet (Aug 11)
- Re: Motorist wins case after maths whizzes break speed camera code (fwd) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 11)