Re: Re: The ArpSucker is b0rn! Be yourself, be the net.

[Barrie Dempster <barrie () reboot-robot net>]

Obviously the moderator though it was appropriate, however, you did
reply to more than bugtraq and at least one non-moderated list. Please
be more careful where you direct your insults.

The guy released a tool he though was useful, if you don't think it is,
a more polite response with some background as to your opinion would
have been more well received.
Calling someone a "lame kiddie" whether it is true or not, doesn't serve
any real purpose, and should also be removed from moderated lists. I
would have much preferred to read your opinion on it backed up by some
example or evidence, rather than a flame of someone who is in my opinion
actually hacking and freely passing on his findings.

Alpt, I for one hope you continue along any research path you see fit,
ignoring flames for the useless noise they are.

On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 08:23, Stefan.Laudat () allianztiriac ro wrote:
> Usually lame kiddie posts like this shouldn't reach the list. Old school 
> ARP attacks are no longer a threat in a decently managed layer 2
> network. I thought bugtraq is still moderated. Oh, Aleph1, where art thee 
> ?
>
> ---
> Stefan Laudat
> Networking & IT Security Manager
> Allianz Tiriac SA Insurance

-- 
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue

  http://www.bsrf.org.uk

[ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part