Full Disclosure mailing list archives
[Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts
From: "yahoo@localhost" <xploitable () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:15:07 +0100
Should Full-Disclosure only allow so-called -real- names? I was on Nanog (a network admin list) and they have a rule where you can only post with a first and second name, instead of an alias or nick, to kind of give more credibility that you are a security professional and not a hax0r or script kiddie. Should the same rule be pro actively implemented to Full-Disclosure or is it a dead duck idea? I know hax0rs or script kiddies would probably use fake first and second names if it was implemented, but at least the list would look neat and a tad more professional? Feedback welcomed.... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts Sir Robert Mortimer Thrip (Oct 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts yahoo@localhost (Oct 16)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts Mike Barushok (Oct 16)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts yossarian (Oct 16)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts Etaoin Shrdlu (Oct 16)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts 404 (Oct 17)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts yahoo@localhost (Oct 17)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts Hugo van der Kooij (Oct 17)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts xploitable (Oct 18)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts backyard@yahoo-inc (Oct 17)