Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: why o why did NASA do this.
From: GuidoZ <uberguidoz () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:00:29 -0400
Ok Mr. Limpy..lol
Just for the record, I fixed that problem I was having with my Linux install! Of course, I've gone and broken it again, but that's besides the point. Now you should be referring to me as Mr. No Limbs (it's completely dead). lol
Great point about the "career" job. Even if they aren't there, knowing a time and a name can get you more information out of a person in another dept, I think. I wouldn't try =)
I thought it was too. =D I wouldn't try it either, but then again, I'm not someone who would be interested in hacking into NASA. It's the ones who WOULD be interested that I worry about. I realize that such information is generally available through public records and such. However, that's no reason to post it all for easy access and saving. ;) -- Peace. ~G On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:59:37 -0500, Todd Towles <toddtowles () brookshires com> wrote:
GuidoZ wrote:=) Yeah, I do. I wasn't sure if you were having a brain fart or something. lolOk Mr. Limpy..lolWell said. It was finally removed from public view, though I'd imagine quite a few saved it just in case (myself included). No, it's not some perfect list for every malicious purpose, though it's certainly better then nothing. Spammers really don't care if it's active or not - they will still sell it. Social Engineering can go a long way though. It's entirely possible someone that worked at NASA in 1996 would be there still today. It's called a career. =)Great point about the "career" job. Even if they aren't there, knowing a time and a name can get you more information out of a person in another dept, I think. I wouldn't try =) -Todd-- Peace. ~G On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:59:36 -0500, Todd Towles <toddtowles () brookshires com> wrote:I meant this outdated NASA e-mail list. I undestand that FDcould beused for this purpose. The fact that NASA just hands you this information(outdated or not)is pretty sad. As I stated before it is free information leakage at best and because it is outdated it should be removed frompublic view.This could be used for social attacks and e-mail attacks. I don't think SPAMmers care about some 6 year old list but hackerswould. Anyinformation that they can get free of charge is just thatmuch better.You know me better than that GuidoZ .....lol-----Original Message----- From: GuidoZ [mailto:uberguidoz () gmail com] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:24 AM To: Todd Towles Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] why o why did NASA do this.how would this list help me spam?Google your email address - then simply use a bot togather ALL theemail addresses listed in the posts along with it. ;) Thesad factis that the email addresses used to post to this list (and any others like it) are freely there for the taking. Plus, it's quite obvious they are active. (More obvious then, say, emailaddies fro1996?) ;) -- Peace. ~G On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:02:00 -0500, Todd Towles <toddtowles () brookshires com> wrote:Exactly as I stated eariler...this is just informationleakage...oldas it might be, it helps...the people on the list are justdoing theirjobs...getting paid and giving information to a employee that knows their name (and is higher in the company) seems harmless.Spam isn'tthe issue with this information leakage, I can buy a CDwith 6 millione-mail address on it...how would this list help me spam?-----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of KF_lists Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:06 AM To: Harry de Grote Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] why o why did NASA do this. Forget about the spammers, how about social engineers.This is quitethe gold mine for that. Hi this is Joe Schmoe from building 69 I need to have my password reset. -KFi have to admit... it's pretty old and useless, but i thinkthis maybe a nice place for spammers to try out some new adresses..._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: why o why did NASA do this., (continued)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Sean Crawford (Oct 18)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. KF_lists (Oct 18)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. Eric Paynter (Oct 18)
- Re[2]: why o why did NASA do this. Geza Papp dr (Axelero) (Oct 18)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Todd Towles (Oct 17)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Todd Towles (Oct 18)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. GuidoZ (Oct 19)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Todd Towles (Oct 19)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. GuidoZ (Oct 19)
- RE: why o why did NASA do this. Todd Towles (Oct 19)
- Re: why o why did NASA do this. GuidoZ (Oct 28)