Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930
From: upb <upbupb () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 02:38:14 +0200
Blah, the difference is that the linux shell does * expansion i think.
hm, i still don't get it: the daemon has to answer to "dir" too, doesn't he? the sole reason that "ls is a unix utility" does not make sense in this context.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Christian Kujau (Nov 16)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Paul Schmehl (Nov 16)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Christian (Nov 16)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 upb (Nov 16)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Paul Schmehl (Nov 17)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 evil (Nov 17)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Christian (Nov 16)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Paul Schmehl (Nov 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- question regarding CAN-2004-0930 evilninja (Nov 16)
- RE: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Castigliola, Angelo (Nov 16)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Rob klein Gunnewiek (Nov 17)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Christian (Nov 17)
- Re: question regarding CAN-2004-0930 Rob klein Gunnewiek (Nov 17)