Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet?
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () ghettot org>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:15:21 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, TK-421 wrote:
Yes, but because it's open source, you know that thousands of eyes are looking at it daily. Especially in larger projects like Mozilla/Firefox.
Riight, 220 MB of sources. On a daily basis, just how many people with source code audit experience are desperate enough to download this and look at more than a couple of files? This does not work as advertised, quite simply; a well placed backdoor is indistinguishable from an unintentional security flaw, and unintentional security flaws can thrive in open source code for years or decades before being spotted. -- ------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: -- Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx] Did you know that clones never use mirrors? --------------------------- 2004-11-11 16:12 -- http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Nov 10)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? TK-421 (Nov 11)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? Michal Zalewski (Nov 11)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- RE: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? Eric Paynter (Nov 11)
- Re: Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet? TK-421 (Nov 11)