Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: irc legaility
From: Mister Coffee <live4java () stormcenter net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:43:41 -0800
Simon Lorentsen wrote:
They could probably be introduced as evidence (email has, after all) but their chances of holding up are fairly limited. It's far too easy to fake IRC channel and message logs for them to really convince a jury of anything.Hi guys / gals,Had a conversation tonight, and have been reading the IRC threads and wondered if anyone could answer the following.In the following scenario; you are a business, is IRC logs of conversations and lists of hosts be help up in a court of law if a client you spoke to refused to pay or hold up the end of a bargain or agreement, and is faxing a document (no hard copies sent via post) accepted as a legal document in a court of law.
If you had sevral logs, from different sources, and they were all the same, it -might- carry a little more weight. As far as acceptance as a "legal document" I believe the answer is "no."
Courts are still a little iffy on digital signatures. Plaintext? It would be a tough case to make.
While there are some exceptionally knowledgeble IT folks on this list, this probably isn't the best place to go for advice on legal matters.I appreciate any help you can give.
Cheers, L4J _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- irc legaility Simon Lorentsen (Nov 20)
- Re: irc legaility Andrew Farmer (Nov 21)
- Re: irc legaility Mister Coffee (Nov 22)
- Re: irc legaility Ron (Nov 22)
- Re: irc legaility Jim Geovedi (Nov 22)
- Re: irc legaility Marius Huse Jacobsen (Nov 25)