Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser)
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <jfernandez () germinus com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 10:45:35 +0200
Ben Ryan wrote:
As expected, LSASS exploit-based worm seems to have arrived. Fasten your seatbelts, those unpatched please use the spew bags provided :) I hope PSS resolves the issues discussed in KB835732.
What's more disturbing is that this worm has established a new record for Microsoft worms [1]. Blaster was the fastest worm (25 days since the patch was published to the worm), this one has been even faster (17 days for the first variant since the patch was published to the worm). Of course, I'm not considering the fact that this issue was known, at least to eEye and Microsoft, for over 5 months.
Regards Javier[1] Approaching the record of worms in other OS, which, I believe, is held by Scalper (10 days from patch to worm). But hey, they could browse the source changes for that one.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) Ben Ryan (May 01)
- Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) Lee (May 01)
- Re: New LSASS-based worm finally here (Sasser) Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (May 03)
- Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Shawn Cox (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Thomas Springer (May 03)
- Unpacking Sasser youssef ALAOUI (May 03)
- RE: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Warnich Rust (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Matt Wagenknecht (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Shawn Cox (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Eric Chien (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Frank Knobbe (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Eric Chien (May 03)
- Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Shawn Cox (May 03)
- Re: Sasser skips 10.x.x.x Why? Rodrigo Barbosa (May 03)