Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Pentesting an IDP-System
From: evilninja <evilninja () gmx net>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 17:52:36 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marcin Owsiany schrieb: | What does "to pentest" mean? I tried 4 dictionaries, without success. | Is it the same as "to test on paper"? penetration testing, as in http://www.penetration-testing.com/ (just found it with google...) - -- BOFH excuse #172: pseudo-user on a pseudo-terminal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAuLHEC/PVm5+NVoYRAuT+AJ9er5vZMXs1vj0y8xm7jE3qZXeiNgCcDsVX Bt+Qn3vz/v9sAyW/c8yaBqk= =JkGK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Pentesting an IDP-System ph03n1x (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Oliver () greyhat de (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Marcin Owsiany (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System evilninja (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Jay Beale (May 30)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System evilninja (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System H D Moore (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Dave King (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Cedric Blancher (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Dave King (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System Darren Bounds (May 29)
- Re: Pentesting an IDP-System ph03n1x (May 30)