Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Cisco's stolen code
From: "Ng, Kenneth (US)" <kenng () kpmg com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:28:40 -0400
Brian: I will give you another good reason to not go near the stolen code. If you EVER want to work on any project that is even remotely related to routers, or routing or anything else that Cisco equipment can do, you can not have touched any of the stolen code, or your code will be suspect. (Your accounting package has queues? Cisco IOS has queues (I assume), you must have copied it.) Even if your writing the code entirely from scratch, because you have seen the stolen code, you may be suspect. Is it unfair? Definitely. But this is why the GNU people emphasize staying away from any licensed source code. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com]On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:59 PM To: Brian Toovey Cc: VX Dude; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Cisco's stolen code On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:28:19 EDT, Brian Toovey <btoovey () igxglobal com> said:
if whitehats dont audit the code, who will? I find your response more ignorant.
Whitehats won't go anywhere near the Cisco code for the same reason they won't go near the Windows code - even if they feel morally justified in peeking at the source code, it's still illegal to do so. So you need at least a slightly gray hat to even consider the idea - so only grey/black hats will benefit. #include <open-source-is-better-because-whitehats-can-audit-too.h> ***************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. ***************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ng, Kenneth (US) (May 25)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Maarten (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Shachar Shemesh (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Azerail (May 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Eric Scher (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code x30n (May 25)
- RE: Re: Cisco's stolen code Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Adam Szilveszter (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
(Thread continues...)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 25)