Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed)
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno () wolff to>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:13:50 -0600
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 19:55:01 -0500, Cael Abal <lists2 () onryou com> wrote:
Bruno, did you read the objections raised in that link I provided? I know how Mail-Followup-To works. I also understand there are unresolved problems with it.
My argument was that it was better than not using it. It isn't a perfect solution.
This will be my last post on the subject, but please consider that MFT is *not* a standard (and as far as I know hasn't shown up in an RFC since the late '90s), supported by only a handful of MUAs... And the (default), polite course of action has historically been not to CC folks in mailinglist posts.
I disagree that not cc'ing senders is the default in general. I think it depends on the kind of list, and the ones I use it is typically preferred that you cc senders unless they indicate that they shouldn't be using a mail-followup-to header. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ), (continued)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia Jason (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Frank Knobbe (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Spiro Trikaliotis (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Cael Abal (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Bruno Wolff III (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Cael Abal (Mar 19)
- Re: Administrivia (very OT, but should be addressed) Bruno Wolff III (Mar 19)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- NEVER open attachments VB (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: Re: NEVER open attachments Blue Boar (Mar 19)
- Re: Re: NEVER open attachments Jim Richardson (Mar 19)
- Message not available
- Re: pgp passphrase Jim Richardson (Mar 20)
- Re: Re: pgp passphrase Blue Boar (Mar 20)
- Re: Re: pgp passphrase Jim Richardson (Mar 20)
- Re: Re: pgp passphrase Cedric Blancher (Mar 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: pgp passphrase Cedric Blancher (Mar 21)