Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Re: Administrivia
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:16:37 -0600 (CST)
[SNIP]
Except I would add that the quoted RFC (which is informational, not mandatory) does say that signatures should be kept short: - If you include a signature keep it short. Rule of thumb is no longer than 4 lines. Remember that many people pay for connectivity by the minute, and the longer your message is, the more they pay. The observant will note that mine breaks this advice (although it doesn't if you ignore the extra bit that I put in. It usually offends at least one person). The RNIB disclaimer is outside my control, except that I have pointed out that it can lead to our own email being classed as SPAM and suggested a link to a web page would be better.
I avoid the issue of required .sig/banners by not posting to lists via my work e-mail. Course that requires one has ssh access to another system. I tend to use two different personal accounts for mailing lists for the most part. Then again I've a .sig just over spec... Thanks, Ron DuFresne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!*** OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Administrivia John . Airey (Mar 19)
- OT: Re: Re: Administrivia Jason (Mar 19)
- RE: Re: Administrivia Ron DuFresne (Mar 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Re: Administrivia Jos Osborne (Mar 19)