Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Caching a sniffer
From: "Justin Baldini" <jbaldini () newmassmedia com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:19:14 -0500
It would probably be better to build it at the switch level. I would think there would be a change in resistance when there is ANYTHING added/removed from the cabling that could be measured by the switch. You could then have it disable that segment upon such detection if you'd like. -jb -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com]On Behalf Of Simon Richter Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:31 AM To: 'Full Disclosure' Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Caching a sniffer Hi, I wonder whether it would be feasible to build network cards that could report the signal reflection characteristics of the link to make it possible to detect sniffing equipment cut into a network cable (should catch magnetic coupling as well). I bet some security conscious folks will pay lots of $$$ for that. Simon -- GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Caching a sniffer, (continued)
- Re: Caching a sniffer morning_wood (Mar 11)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Tim (Mar 10)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Chris Adams (Mar 10)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Eric LeBlanc (Mar 11)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Simon Richter (Mar 11)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Kenton Smith (Mar 11)
- RE: Caching a sniffer Mike Fratto (Mar 11)
- RE: Caching a sniffer Kenton Smith (Mar 11)
- RE: Caching a sniffer David Bartholomew (Mar 11)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Simon Richter (Mar 12)
- RE: Caching a sniffer Justin Baldini (Mar 12)
- RE: Caching a sniffer Mike Fratto (Mar 11)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Cael Abal (Mar 10)
- Re: Caching a sniffer Lan Guy (Mar 11)
- RE: Caching a sniffer Dave Horsfall (Mar 11)