Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)
From: "Berend-Jan Wever" <SkyLined () edup tudelft nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:35:02 +0200
----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Copley" <dcopley () eeye com>
Yeah. It is a zero day worm, and it is very notable as such. I can not recall a previous zero day worm. (AV is not my job, but I do try and follow zero day.) Hence, IE has birthed us the first zero day worm. We should be thankful it was not coded better, because it could have caused some really serious problems. A hundred thousand systems is really a low target when you consider 94% of all browsers being used are IE and the internet population is around the 400 million figure.
Just be thankfull the guy didn't take the time to find a 0day xss issues in webbased e-mail services like hotmail/yahoo/etc... I still wonder why these have not been exploited by email virii: They're not that hard to find (check your archives) and it's just too easy to code a small worm in javascript for these sites (I know from experience). The only propagation limiting problem is that all trafic goes through centralized servers which can be easily updated (check your archives for site-specific responds times). But if you combine it with your regular e-mail worm techniques, you can be sure propagation continues after that fix. Cheers, SkyLined _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues, (continued)
- Re: RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Michael Reilly (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geoincidents (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Clayton Kossmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Luke Norman (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geoincidents (Mar 29)
- RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Lou Zirko (Mar 29)
- Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues neal rauhauser (Mar 29)
- AW: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Ron Stiemer (Mar 29)
- Message not available
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 30)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Drew Copley (Mar 29)
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Berend-Jan Wever (Mar 29)
- Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 29)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Exibar (Mar 29)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Thor Larholm (Mar 29)
- Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Tim (Mar 29)
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Jelmer (Mar 30)
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) - - (Mar 30)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Drew Copley (Mar 30)