Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Akamai
From: scosol <scosol () scosol org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:36:13 -0700
james edwards wrote:
I don't think so- yeah a DOS against the content nodes isn't gonna do much but a DOS against their nameservers is fully workable.Akamai seems to be saying the NS was functioning: The spokesman denied however that it was an outage and ****said that the Akamai name service continued to function throughout the attack**** which ended around two hours later.
That's BS-See these Symantec and Apple graphs- the outage was clearly at the DNS level:
http://anon.scosol.speedera.net/anon.scosol/apple_outage.png http://anon.scosol.speedera.net/anon.scosol/symantec_outage.png It's my 24/7 job to monitor Akamai :) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Akamai, (continued)
- Re: Akamai Darren Reed (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai Paul Schmehl (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Ron DuFresne (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Peter van den Heuvel (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Peter van den Heuvel (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai gabriel rosenkoetter (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Darren Reed (Jun 17)
- Re: Akamai scosol () scosol org (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai james edwards (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai scosol (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai Ben Nelson (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai james edwards (Jun 15)