Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior
From: "Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ]" <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway technolabs net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:54:56 +0530
You gotta be more specific than FW-1. FW-1 can run over a large number of OS. You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS. Also FW-1 can run on a large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc. Each has it's strengths and weaknesses.
now you are talking, if you are using BSD how about using Openbsd with the paket filter ? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ éb½êÞvë"axZÞx÷«²ÚGb¶*'¡ó[kj¯ðÃæj)mªÿrÿ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ] (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior Darren Reed (Jun 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior Gary E. Miller (Jul 01)
- Re: Re: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior Darren Reed (Jul 01)