Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: W2K source "leaked"?
From: Allen/gore/SlackWareWolf <goreBOFH () comcast net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:06:41 -0500
I think they should release the source for NT anyway. They are pretty much dropping it, and they say it is so badly made they can hardly fix it, well, why not let the REAL hackers out there who can make an OS, take a look at it. Maybe they are a little nervouse? Maybe people would see it was badly made? Wither way I know ALOT of people who STILL swear by NT. With proper skill, NT can be made hard. 2,000 is similar, and I think it would be great if they finally said "Ok, fine, here is the source". -- __________________________________________________ We Are 138 http://www.suse.com http://www.slackware.org http://www.bsd.org http://www.daemonnews.org/ http://www.cannibalholocaust.net http://www.misfits.com http://www.onethirtyeight.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: W2K source "leaked"?, (continued)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Christopher Blume (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? cameronmcansh (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Isaac Privett (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? cameronmcansh (Feb 12)
- Re: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Mike Roetto (Feb 13)
- Re: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Paul O'Malley (Feb 13)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Gadi Evron (Feb 13)
- Partial protection against MyDoom Tomasz Grabowski (Feb 12)
- RE: Partial protection against MyDoom ragdelaed (Feb 12)
- RE: Partial protection against MyDoom ragdelaed (Feb 12)