Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch
From: mescsa <mescsa () yahoo com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Nick FitzGerald wrote:
I don't know what you've been smoking/drinking/whatever, but get off it and go read the relevant RFCs -- 1945 & 2616. Do _NOT_ be misled by RFC 2396 -- it is relevant, but largely for the parts of a URI's general form that are specifically negated in the other RFCs.
Can you give any hint where to find this vital information within RFC 2616? I'm misled, too. Thank you mescsa __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch martin f krafft (Feb 08)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Nick FitzGerald (Feb 08)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch mescsa (Feb 08)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Nick FitzGerald (Feb 08)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Guido van Rooij (Feb 09)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Guido van Rooij (Feb 09)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch mescsa (Feb 09)
- Exclusive: Windows 2000 & Windows NT 4 Source Code Leaks jB (Feb 12)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch mescsa (Feb 08)
- Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Nick FitzGerald (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch David Farinic (Feb 09)
- RE: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Darren Bennett (Feb 09)
- RE: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch Brad Griffin (Feb 09)