Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version
From: Tim <full-disclosure () err0rr com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:16:39 -0500
I agree to some extent, however it does bring it to the attention of a wider audience and force the maintainers to patch the problem rather than allow the exploit to continue to circulate amongst quieter crowds, in which case it may never be patched. On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 18:44, -={|TooManyMirrors|}=- wrote:
I am a little confused as to what is "full-disclosure" about a binary only exploit? In my humble opinion full-disclosure is inteded to share knoladge not just support easy exploitation. giving easy access to a 'spoit discloses nothing and helps no one but script kiddies Toomanymirrors
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version Alexander (Feb 23)
- Re: SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version airsupply () freebsdchina org (Feb 23)
- Re: SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version -={|TooManyMirrors|}=- (Feb 24)
- Re: SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version Tim (Feb 24)
- Re: SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version -={|TooManyMirrors|}=- (Feb 24)
- Re: SHOUTcast Server 1.8.x remote heap overrun exploit binary version airsupply () freebsdchina org (Feb 23)