Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ...
From: Nancy Kramer <nekramer () mindtheater net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:47:14 -0500
What Gregory says makes a lot of sense. MS is trying to use free labor to improve their competitive advantage. The good thing about it is that MS software will probably be more secure as a result for the endusers and the net community as a whole.
Regards, Nancy Kramer Webmaster http://www.americandreamcars.com Free Color Picture Ads for Collector Cars One of the Ten Best Places To Buy or Sell a Collector Car on the Web At 04:45 PM 2/18/2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
Did I miss the thread or has no one yet postulated that the Microsoft source code subset was leaked intentionally in order to afford M$ the free services of hundreds or thousands of security researchers auditing their code for them? It is a known fact that Windows 2000 and XP are soon to be depreciated in favor of the next generation OS. W2K and WXP will be supported for another year or so afterwards. The new component probably will contain some of the current code set, so why not risk a couple of serious exploits (like M$ cares) in favor of getting your code certified by the community for free? G On or about 2004.02.18 13:06:44 +0000, Blue Boar (BlueBoar () thievco com) said: > There are clear, admitted cases of reverse engineering by vulnerabiity > researchers, which are prohibited by EULA, and which MS has so far > declined to pursue. Why should this be different? MS afraid the EULA > restrictions wouldn't hold up? --Gregory A. Gilliss, CISSP E-mail: greg () gilliss com Computer Security WWW: http://www.gilliss.com/greg/ PGP Key fingerprint 2F 0B 70 AE 5F 8E 71 7A 2D 86 52 BA B7 83 D9 B4 14 0E 8C A3_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- InfoSec sleuths beware, Microsoft's attorneys may be knocking at your door Bernie, CTA (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware, Microsoft's attorneys may be knocking at your door Blue Boar (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware, Microsoft's attorneys may be knocking at your door Cael Abal (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Nancy Kramer (Feb 18)
- RE: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (Feb 19)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... madsaxon (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Byron Copeland (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... madsaxon (Feb 18)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Exibar (Feb 19)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Dave Horsfall (Feb 19)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Exibar (Feb 19)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... michael williamson (Feb 19)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Calum (Feb 19)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware ... Dave Horsfall (Feb 20)
- Re: InfoSec sleuths beware, Microsoft's attorneys may be knocking at your door Blue Boar (Feb 18)