Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FW: Question for DNS pros
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:29:55 -0500 (CDT)
[SNIP]
Mine are identical to yours. Same host, same src port, same types of packets, same ttl, same len) Whatever this is is obviously crafted from some sort of script. The only thing I can think of is recon. If someone has any bright ideas, speak up.
I think Frank mentioned the packets being like 2048 in size, and this makes me wonder if it's a tad more then mere recon. Might be trying to exploit or develope an exploit for bind. and might be a tool in progress for a specific bind OS combo. But, I find just tossing the offenders into the "not allowed" list of entowrk addresses reduces the log fluff as well as hinder progressive testing, for them, at least off my networks. Thanks, Ron DuFresne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!*** OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Mark (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros grutz (Aug 03)