Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: lame bitching about xpsp2
From: "Jos Osborne" <Jos () meltemi co uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:51:16 +0100
Release candidates are not beta's. That's why beta's are called beta's and releasecandidates releasecandidates. Eventhough, beta's should already have a certain reliability, since beta means: ready for a scheduled releasetime. That is even more so for releasecandidates because (yes:) they are releasecandidates.
So they'd be Gamma's? Jos _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2, (continued)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Dinis Cruz (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 devis (Aug 13)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Dinis Cruz (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 intellicomp.cl (Aug 14)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Soderland, Craig (Aug 16)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Ill will (Aug 16)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 joe (Aug 16)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Ill will (Aug 16)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Random Letters (Aug 16)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Al Reust (Aug 17)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Random Letters (Aug 18)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Goencz, Otto (Aug 18)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Jos Osborne (Aug 18)