Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: AV Naming Convention


From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:33:33 -0500

So if I change my name the police can't find me? ;)

AV companies should be able to work with any form of ID. Use their local
until an agreement as been made. 

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Thomas Loch
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:09 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] AV Naming Convention

This completely misses the point.
I do not completely agree ...

When a new virus is discovered, it is 
essential that there is a RAPID response to the threat. ...
I agree...

...The idead of 
handing the critter over to a committee to decide it's name is, quite
frankly, plain bonkers.
Why?


Why can't we handle not yet named viruses as 'unnamed' or we use a 
standardized (by ISO?) method to generate a numeric code that consists of a 
classification in categories and a sequential number and probably some kind 
of checksum or hash until the virus gets an official name?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: