Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?)
From: Colin Slater <hoho () tacomeat net>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:08:59 -0400
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 11:56, Feher Tamas wrote:
Hello,The terrorsts are not stupid, they use strong encryption and there is proof that PGP repels NSA.What proof are you referring to?The case of the italian comrades: http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,110841,00.asp
Perhaps you've never read Cryptonomicon. The NSA is not stupid. Just because they claim they can't decrypt something means nothing about their actual capabilities. The NSA certainly is not interested in revealing its capabilities to the rest of the world just to catch a few criminals. It would be far more profitable to use this capability for foriegn inteligence, when the public does not has to know how the information was retrieved, than to blow it on one case and have everyone switch to a different cipher. This isn't an obscure topic relegated to dissertations in information theory. Rent the movie Enigma, or borrow cryptonomicon or quicksilver by Neal Stephenson from your library. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Feher Tamas (Apr 07)
- Re: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Exibar (Apr 07)
- Re: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Colin Slater (Apr 07)
- Re: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Szilveszter Adam (Apr 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Tremaine Lea (Apr 07)
- RE: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) James . Cupps (Apr 07)
- RE: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Ng, Kenneth (US) (Apr 07)
- RE: On PGP (was: Wiretap or Magic Lantern?) Ian Latter (Apr 07)