Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: MSN\Qwest ships DSL modem with "unconfigurable" firewall


From: David Gianndrea <dgianndrea () comsquared com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:01:20 -0400

Look up NAT-T @ cisco.com. That should help ya!


Volker Tanger wrote:

Greetings!

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:19:59 -0700 James Lay <jlay () ameriben com> wrote:


Real quick...just implemented a Cisco VPN concentrator here and lo and
behold certain users couldn't get in.  The concentrator is setup with
the standard UDP port 500.  All users BESIDES MSN\Qwest DSL users
could get right on.  After a few calls and some frustration, Qwest
informed us that the firewall on the DSL router they ship is
"unconfigurable"



That is because you'll need AH/ESP (== IP type 50/51) in addition to
IKE, if you want to implement IPSec VPN.

Most el-cheapo routers only support ICMP (== IP type 1) TCP (== IP type 6) and UDP (== IP type 17)

Thus you'd need an encapsulation of ESP traffic like the soft-VPN
clients of Nortel and CheckPoint offer (probably just because of this
problem). Or you'd have to have a router that really supports "IPSec-Forwarding" (i.e. blind forwarding of IP types 50+51 to a
specific IP to be configured in the router). Data sheets don't always
tell the truth here, so you really should verify before rollout...
Qapla'

Volker Tanger
ITK Security

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

--
David Gianndrea
Senior Network Engineer
Comsquared Systems, Inc.

Email:   dgianndrea () comsquared com
Web:     www.comsquared.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: