Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: FD should block attachments
From: "Mike Smith" <mike () sane com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 19:52:21 -0400
They have the choice not to sign up, and read the FD archives
instead.
If you can't deal with the noise/virii/ect/ect that comes with an unmoderated list, unsubscribe right now!You're the second person that has suggested this. I'm amazed by the insensitivity. If the shoe was on the other foot, would you be content
to
peruse the archives?
The insensitivity? Maybe that's the problem... This isn't about believing the internet can be utopia to me... I use this information to benefit my career and the company I work for. I *DO* pay for much of the content I use because I need the information without the wasted time/bandwidth that comes with free/open information sources like full disclosure. Like everything else, you get what you pay for. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments, (continued)
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Luke Norman (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 03)
- RE: FD should block attachments Sean Crawford (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Troy (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Nick FitzGerald (Apr 04)
- Re: FD should block attachments fd (Apr 04)
- RE: FD should block attachments Mike Smith (Apr 02)
- FD should block attachments dickcox (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Mike Smith (Apr 04)
- RE: FD should block attachments Sean Crawford (Apr 04)