Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: new ssh exploit?
From: Shanphen Dawa <list () hardlined com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:41:28 -0500
Do you have a site, with maybe comparisons between the two? I am always looking for bigger and better things :-) On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:39:27 -0400 Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net> wrote:
2003-09-16T11:25:47 Ron DuFresne:On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, christopher neitzert wrote:1. upgrade to lsh.But, one has to remember ssh does not stand alone, at least openssh, it needs openssl to be properly maintained as well.Another incentive to ditch openssh altogether. lsh seems to work fine. At last. lsh doesn't use openssl. It is a completely different code base from the other sshes. It's ssh v2 only; I think that's a transition whose time has come. -Bennett
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: new ssh exploit?, (continued)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Damian Gerow (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Bennett Todd (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Damian Gerow (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Perry E. Metzger (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? KF (Sep 18)
- Re: new ssh exploit? KF (Sep 18)
- lsh patch (was Re: new ssh exploit?) Bennett Todd (Sep 19)
- Re: lsh patch (was Re: new ssh exploit?) Carl Livitt (Sep 19)
- Re: lsh patch (was Re: new ssh exploit?) Niels Möller (Sep 19)
- Re: new ssh exploit? Shanphen Dawa (Sep 16)