Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Office 2000 Vulnerability
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards () hq adiscon com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:10:51 +0200
Yes I have seen pirated copies on clients machines that can have SP1 and SP2 applied but it is tricky and not for the novice user. Once SP1 and Sp2 have been applied it can then be updated fully to all the vulnerabilities. I am sure there are tons of pirated copies floating around that the usual user would not have a clue on how to patch them. Whether it is up to m$ to allow these to be patched is a whole kettle of beans that I will assume they would say if you don't pay for it then $crew you.
We are ourselvs selling software. Thus I know the issue. My point is that this way aren't the hurting the community at large more than the pirates? So they may screw the pirate, but in doing so they screw me, a legitimate customer. I also think this is not an MS-only issue. In fact, I need to think about our own policies in this regard... In the real world, would it be OK if you let a thief crush a truck because you know the brakes are broken but you don't tell him? What about the innocent victims that got hit by the truck? Rainer _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Office 2000 Vulnerability Michael De La Cruz (Sep 09)
- Re: Office 2000 Vulnerability Nick FitzGerald (Sep 10)
- Re: Office 2000 Vulnerability Dave Howe (Sep 10)
- Re: Office 2000 Vulnerability Nick FitzGerald (Sep 11)
- Re: Office 2000 Vulnerability Dave Howe (Sep 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Office 2000 Vulnerability Rainer Gerhards (Sep 10)
- RE: Office 2000 Vulnerability Jason Bethune (Sep 10)
- RE: Office 2000 Vulnerability Rainer Gerhards (Sep 10)
- Re: Office 2000 Vulnerability Chris Wanstrath (Sep 10)
- Re: Office 2000 Vulnerability Nick FitzGerald (Sep 10)